Tuesday

Letter to the World 1


This is the first of three letters by Samuel Widmer addressed to fellow human beings all over the world


Dear brother, dear sister,

Dear fellow human beings all over the world,

Do we not have a task, a task in common, which is enormous and unbelievable, for which we have all come to this planet? And doesn’t this mission consist in materialising the fundamental oneness of all being on earth, on our planet? The oneness out of which we all come and into which we will unavoidably go again. And does this not imply that we have to help allow this unity to shine through the area of separation, so that it can reveal itself in this particular realm of the universe which is energetically perhaps the most dense?

Till now we have not been too successful in fulfilling this task. Of course we have done well in terms of technology and science, but, when it comes to caring for each other, or to the feeling of togetherness, we are quite backward, aren’t we?

Hasn’t the time come, for us to overcome our egoism, our restricted personal, tribal or family obsessed thinking? To overcome thinking in terms of such concepts as nation and state, and to open ourselves instead to an all-embracing thought process, to compassion, which encompasses each and every thing, which does not exclude anyone or anything and strives for a peaceful coexistence with all things and creatures?

Where are you, brothers and sisters? Don’t you want to help with this big and beautiful goal for which we have eventually come here? Help to finally regenerate our earth into a place of peace, of love and of safety for all?

Weren’t we promised to each other with this intention from the very first, right from the beginning?

Don’t you want to help?

And wouldn’t the steps that we need to take be quite simple and practical, steps to initiate this regeneration? Would we not need a new, quite simple view of things, such as one that every child could develop or really would develop, if we only allowed it to think for itself without subjecting it to all sorts of propaganda, or ideology?

Shouldn’t we finally find the courage to oppose the simple solution that politicians have been offering us for centuries all over the world which is: “War! Let’s kill the guys who are bad!” with another, maybe equally naive message: “For once, let’s try it with love!”

We human beings love simple messages, even though we have long seen through experience that they don’t offer solutions to anything at all. Shouldn’t we have the courage to go for a real alternative, in contrast to the misery which is always the same? An alternative, that could wake up the world and polarise the spirits? Are we afraid we would be laughed at if we were to oppose the eternal war cry with an equally naive message?

“For once, let’s try with love! Why not - at long last - with love?”

Would not a statesman of mark, a charismatic statesman, who seriously represented this view, be able to gather the suffering masses behind him? Such leaders however, always think they need to convince and to gather around them, those in positions of financial power. But the poor are far more numerous. Who could resist them if they were to stand up, and to compel the rich minority to cooperate?

“Love” as a voting motto!

And then to make a concrete, practical political program out of it.

What does love mean, quite concretely?

Shouldn’t we definitely address some basic things? Shouldn’t we in the first place, plead for the de-allocation of all military budgets of all states worldwide and use the money for different purposes? For education, for instance, for social welfare, for the economic regeneration of the third world? We have to do away with all armies everywhere, in all countries. Should we not find the courage, every single country, to go ahead with this? Unilaterally. The time for military solutions is long over. And above all, we need the money that is wasted on it, urgently - in order to live.

And in order to bring about the conditions for equality and justice, should we not develop above all, a totally new monetary system, finally a pure, fair means of exchange, a Terra, for example, which has the same, unchangeable value everywhere. A unified currency, which cannot be speculated with, a money system which doesn’t accumulate interest when hoarded, but instead loses its value and ages, like all passing things do? And should not every person’s time, regardless of where he lives, be worth the same? Should we not finally, correct this mistake in our monetary system, this egoistic betrayal, so that a worldwide and just blossoming would become possible? Could we not, just by this step, protect the resources of our earth, support the development of alternative energies and technologies, bring war and poverty to an end, and in doing this, vanquish all injustice between man and man, between man and woman, between region and region?

If peace and justice among human beings were merely a technical problem to be solved, we would have done so long ago quite skilfully. Why, when it comes to a psychological problem with which we have to struggle, do we act so stupidly and not come out directly with the solution?

With fire and passion we should go for these things, each one for himself, alone, knowing that we are building a more beautiful and happier, a new world with it.

Should we not stand for real globalisation? Away with all the frontiers! Isn’t it high time for a world government to come into being, not one based on might or power but rather a purely organisational and administrative one? Haven’t the structures for this been established for a long time, for instance the United Nations and all other international structures? We would only have to assign them the legislative competence.

Of course, as accompanying measures, other things would have to be done, first of all a categorical reform of land ownership. The land would belong to everyone, would be owned by the community, and private enterprise would only put it to use. And the rent for utilising this land, to be paid to the community, shouldn’t it go to the mothers and children, so that the children, who are actually the children of the whole community - and their mothers, who look after them - would finally get the basic supplies, which they are entitled to?

Would we not also have to do away with the right of succession, which is the background of great injustice too? If someone dies, should not everything he possesses be returned to the community, where it belongs? And of course we would surely also introduce an ecological tax, to protect our earth.

These outer changes alone would of course not be of much use in the long run. We all know that. It would rather take a new inner alignment, an awakening in every single person for community, we would have to wake up to the fact of our belonging together, to our responsibility to each other. So to realise this, should we not totally reform our entire school system? And of course, all of it all over the world. Self-knowledge! Shouldn’t training in self-knowledge be the first topic to be introduced in every educational programme everywhere?

What’s the use of technical knowledge in the heads of individuals who do not understand themselves?

Should we not have deep insight into our self-addictive, self-centred thoughts and feelings and awaken to the fact of our being conditioned to think in nationalistic and tribal terms at the political level? Should we not see the way we are culturally imprinted to be ambitious, competitive and envious? And should we not overcome these things which are not beautiful, in the light of self-knowledge?

And have we not received the best aids as gifts to help us - gifts which we have however demonised and forbidden till now? Should we not finally support the use of valuable means such as the psycholytical substances, those gifts of the gods? Support them both in psychotherapy and in ritualistic, spiritual and community-building utilisations? Should we not make them accessible to all human beings, so that they be helped for their awakening?

Should we not finally also accept “the teaching”, which over and over again and from time to time has been imparted to us by great teachers (the most recent ones being Don Juan Matus and Jiddu Krishnamurti) and integrate it in ourselves? Should we not listen to them and allow ourselves to be taught by them?

Should we not finally question the taboo on incest, which as basic evil lies behind all our misery, understand its effects in our life, and finally negate it?

Should we not encourage each other to do all these things and allow ourselves to be led by them? Should not every one of us stand up for it with a passionate and loving heart, a heart, which has been purified in the process of self-knowledge? Should we not finally embark upon all this, gather together for this – or at least the more mature ones among us?

Dear brother, dear sister, where are you? Don’t you want to help in this great, wonderful and only meaningful task there is, which we are faced with? I’m aware that most probably you will not listen to me, that maybe you never will see, or read this letter, and if you do, you will not accept it, will not take it seriously, will not take it to heart. The message “Love each other! Serve each other!”, although it already reached us two thousand years ago and has spread widely ever since, never really became popular among us.

Nevertheless I’m writing to you, simply because it is right to do it. Simply because it is right to try to reach you. Even if it seems hopeless, it is better to do what to be done.

Samuel Widmer Nicolet


Letter to the world II

Letter to the world III

Home <<

Letter to the World II

We do not want any social workers alms, we want justice!



Dear fellow human beings,

A second letter to the world wants to follow the first, to spell out the concerns of the silent and suffering majority of the human community. The great thing about finding oneself in the position of the disadvantaged and powerless is that at least one does not have to hold back in making demands. Of course, while doing this it is already understood and accepted that most likely these will never be met.

The demands of the large NGO’s (non-governmental organisations) are not enough. Eg. Fighting for a tax on speculative investment capital (Attac), for the immediate and complete cancellation of debt for third world countries (Jubilé 2000); a reassessment of the “terms of trade” (Third World Network); against malnutrition and hunger (Action Contre la Faime (ACF)); against the exploitation of workers (Jobs with Justice); for the rights of those imprisoned (Amnesty International), for the rights of children or women or whatever. To us all, these causes appear absolutely necessary and honourable, but definitely too partial.

We want everything, completely. We want justice and equality for all. And we want it now.

To be specific, as a first measure to address a most pressing need, why should a global Foundation not be able to raise 80 billion dollars annually for the next ten years, which according to the United Nations Development Program (UNDP, 2004) is what is needed to ensure that every human being on earth has access to sufficient food, clean drinking water (including sanitary infrastructure), basic schooling, and healthcare (including gynaecological treatment for women)? If we recognise and respect the fact that we manage to raise 1000 billion dollars worldwide on an annual basis, for military expenses, most of which at the moment is spent on the world war against terror, which in fact is mainly a war against the poor and hungry, then it should be conceivable and possible for well-meaning forces on earth to be able to raise less than ten percent of that amount for a minimum in justice and care.

Specifically, a foundation, which acts, thinks, and has compassion on a global scale, should try to channel and combine all positive powers, all powers of opposition and resistance, the power of existing organisations and associations in the private and public sphere, in order to complete this minimum deed of solidarity.

In addition to this, and besides a total cancellation of debt of all human beings and countries, and not just in the third world - and besides all other previously mentioned adjustments - we demand first and with immediate effect a reform of land ownership (the land is public property, but is used under private law). We also demand above all a new monetary system (a unit - for example, a “Terra”, which has the same value everywhere, cannot be used speculatively, and does not pay any interest if it is hoarded). Should a Foundation, which is to be taken really seriously, which truly represents the interests of the whole human community, not include all these things in its activities?

If a state of total war and total chaos has now set in, we at least want to use this state of affairs which the resulting epochal changes demand, for a radical treatment and total renewal on behalf of the many victims,

We do not want alms, we want justice!

As the hunger does not arise only through problems connected with globalisation, but is born mainly out of the ongoing human disposition for war and violence, all these measures will probably not change too much in the end. Thus finally the individual can only choose to adopt the stance of the smiling sage towards all misery. The smiling sage recognises, that nothing is to be done; he accepts everything, just as it is, and recognises its congruence. Still, he does what he can do and does not ask why. This is why he can demand, without demanding, and see the misery without being unhappy.

Samuel Widmer Nicolet


Sunday

Letter to the World III

The last in a series of three letters addressed to human beings all over the world
Letter to the world I
Letter to the world II


1. May 2006 (Labour Day)
We are calling for a revolution!


Dear Brothers, dear Sisters,

We are calling for a revolution. For the renewal of the r-evolution. For the continuation of the revolution. First and foremost for an inner revolution of course, for a revolution of love, but then also for a revolution in the external world, for a peaceful revolution of resistance to everything that is an obstacle to love.

Aren't we entitled to rid ourselves of governments, that do not work for the basic human interests and rights? Does not every democratic constitution contain the primary right to dispose of a government which deviates from these goals? Do they not contain the right to withdraw the government's legitimacy and to instate a new government, which will finally act for the benefit of all human beings?

And isn't it in the interest of the population, i.e. the totality of human beings, that military structures of any kind disappear from the face of this planet, and that funds which are currently used for the military be instead used for our blooming? Shouldn't these funds be used to finally tackle the most crude problems we face, such as starvation, the lack of clean drinking water, the education of all children, and basic health care for all humans? And isn't it in the interest of the population, that a new, fair monetary system would help renew our communal life? Shouldn't we get rid of any governments or private organisations which do not focus all their powers towards these aims?

We are calling for a revolution. For a peaceful revolution. For the joint resistance to everything, that is not helpful and useful to us as human community. We are calling for a passive boycott!

In doing so, we do not contradict our society and its order, but on the contrary, doesn't today's structure of society actually contradict everything that is just and fair?

Could an effective, common, ideally global boycott take the form of a refusal to pay any taxes? A refusal to pay, as long as taxes are wasted for senseless things such as military or wars or for servicing debt (i.e. serving capital)? At least, we could transfer the percentage that is used for these senseless things, for example 50%, into an account for the third world and give only the receipts to the tax authorities.

Is not every community, every commune, every state, the whole world, are we not all suffocating in debt, which strife and the servicing of capital are costing us? Aren't we bankrupt, although we have everything, land and life, our capacity for happiness, our capacity for work, and all the many things, which we produce?

Imagine, if one day the community would rise up, simply cast off its debts, simply write off its debts! Imagine, if it simply said: "We are free! We have our life, our land, our earth! We have our work and our capacity for happiness. We have all the many, many things, which we produce. We have everything we need. We are blooming. We are rich.”

Imagine! Who could do something about that? Who could fight against it? Who would fight against it? Simply get out the calculator, caluculate!

How simple everything becomes, when one looks with the eyes of a child.[1]

We are calling for a revolution of love. For a peaceful revolution, for a common resistance, for a passive boycott.

Aren't we entitled, even obliged, to free ourselves from governments which do not care about the wellbeing of the people? To free ourselves from public or private forces, which curtail human rights, which suppress and oppress them? And aren't governments, which corruptly take care of their own, governments, which do not work for justice relating to the financial system, for justice about the riches of the earth, for justice in the distribution of land and goods, aren't they governments which do not act in the best interest of the people?[2]

We are calling for a global, peaceful resistance!

Why should we pay taxes to finance wars which are started by the rich and powerful to further their own interests?

There is a fatal, fatalistic wrong belief, which we all fell for. Namely, that we cannot do anything. But that is not true. Individuals are more powerful than all other powers, as soon as they unite, join each other in common action. That is the power of love, the power of the new story, which we are all waiting for.



What we need is an inner revolution, an awakening of love, of compassion, of the spirit of community in every one. Again and again, that comes first. Only self-knowledge will bring this awakening. But this awakening ultimately leads to common action, which will change the world, it leads to a complete, external revolution, a rearranging of our whole live.

We have almost no glimpse of the wonder, of the wonder of love, which is possible for us humans, and which we could and will effect on our planet. We are waiting for it to bloom.

Samuel Widmer Nicolet

Letter to the world I
Letter to the world II

[1] From the new and socialy critical novel Celias Garden by Paul Nicolet alias Samuel Widmer, which will be published in the autumn of 2006.

[2] More to the monetary system you can find in the diary of Samuel und Danièle Widmer Nicolet, Today a Daughter Was Born to Us, basic editions, 2005

Wednesday

Psycholytic Psychotherapy


Samuel Widmer is part of a group of psychotherapists in Switzerland, who in the late eighties, were granted permission by the Swiss government to use certain consciousness expanding substances in their therapeutic work.


The group sessions which Samuel conducted during this time showed that such substances, used in the right setting were of invaluable help to clients struggling with their personal issues and especially those who were not able to get further with the traditional forms of therapy. Substances like MDMA and LSD, opened the floodgates of the mind which allowed a range of insights through, insights which could help the person concerned to make necessary changes in his or her life. These experiences are documented in his book "Listening into the heart of things" in which the reader gets a good idea of the way substances can be used in psychotherapy.

_______

Among psychiatrists who used substances to enhance awareness in their patients was Stanislav Grof who conducted over four thousand sessions using LSD in the fifties, and till the time that this drug was banned in the U.S. where he worked.

In 1967, Grof was invited as an Assistant Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, USA, and went on to become Chief of Psychiatric Research at the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center where he worked with Walter Pahnke and Bill Richards among others. In 1973, Dr. Grof was invited to the Esalen Institute in Big Sur, California, and lived there until 1987 as a scholar-in-residence, developing his ideas.

Unfortunately the panic reaction to the use of substances, set off by ill researched articles in the press and the dogmatic thinking of most governments has largely resulted in their being banned under pressure, in many parts of the world. This has deprived people everywhere, of a method of self enquiry which has been shown to be effective in terms of healing.

Links for those interested in this subject:

Book review of "Listening into the heart of things" by Samuel Widmer
http://www.maps.org/news-letters/v08n3/08342wid.html

Interview with Stanislav Grof:
http://www.healthy.net/scr/interview.asp?Id=200

The Swiss research in consciousness expanding substances:
http://www.maps.org/news-letters/v05n3/05303psy.html

Early research in psychedelic and psycholytic psychotherapy:
http://www.maps.org/docs/psyche.html#earlyresearchlsd